Step 4 of ASC 606 requires an allocation of the total consideration in a contract to which an entity is legally entitled to collect to each distinct performance obligation. This allocation is determined based on the standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract, the process of which is comprised of two distinct sub-steps:
- Determine the Standalone Selling Price
- Allocate the Transaction Price
Exceptions to the process apply for discounts and variable consideration, which are not covered in this post.
What is a Standalone Selling Price?
The standalone selling price is the price at which an entity would sell a promised good or service separately to a customer. The best evidence of a standalone selling price is the observable price of a good or service when the entity sells that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers. A contractually stated price or a list price for a good or service may be (but shall not be presumed to be) the standalone selling price of that good or service. If a standalone selling price is not directly observable, an entity shall estimate the standalone selling price based on certain rules that require an entity shall consider all information (including market conditions, entity specific factors and information about the customer or class of customer) that is reasonably available to the entity.
Suitable Methods for Estimating Standalone Selling Price
1. Adjusted Market Assessment Approach
An entity could evaluate the market in which it sells goods or services and estimate the price that a customer in that market would be willing to pay for those goods or services. That approach also might include referring to prices from the entity’s competitors for similar goods or services and adjusting those prices as necessary to reflect the entity’s costs and margins.
2. Expected Cost Plus a Margin Approach
An entity could forecast its expected costs of satisfying a performance obligation and then add an appropriate margin for that good or service.
3. Residual Approach
An entity may estimate the standalone selling price by reference to the total transaction price less the sum of the observable standalone selling prices of other goods or services promised in the contract. However, an entity may use a residual approach to estimate standalone selling price only if one of the following criteria is met:
- The entity sells the same good or service to different customers (at or near the same time) or a broad range of amounts (i.e., the selling price is highly variable because a representative standalone selling price is not discernible from past transactions or other observable evidence).
- The entity has not yet established a price for that good or service, and the good or service has not previously been sold on a standalone basis (i.e., the selling price is uncertain).
Let us refer to a sample SaaS transaction and walk through determining standalone selling price (SSP). In our example, an accounting and financial corporation sells SaaS-based accounting and financial cloud solutions:
Sub-Step 1: Determine Standalone Selling Price
Step 2 of ASC 606 requires identification of distinct performance obligations that have significant standalone functionality. The Distinct Performance Obligations identified in this contract are:
Annual Recurring Services
- Subscription to Core and User Modules – Fixed
- User License – Fixed or Variable
- Annual Support – Priced as a part of subscription
This is billed on a T&E basis.
Standalone Selling Price of Recurring Annual Services
The Core, Add-On modules and User License have significant standalone functionality as observed by renewals of such SaaS contracts. Annual Support related to hosting and security is never sold standalone and is often priced as a part of the subscription. Enhanced Support is often sold standalone as observed from subsequent renewals.
An analysis of the observable standalone renewal transactions reveals that the Core and the Add-On Modules have an SSP of $60,000 vs. the $49,000 (gross) value on the contract.
Professional Services for the accounting and financial corporation are often performed by third-party vendor partners.
The accounting and financial corporation performed an Adjusted Market Assessment Approach by performing a market analysis of hourly rates for similar services. This analysis revealed an SSP of $145 per hour.
Sub-Step 2: Allocate the Transaction Price
Once the SSP is determined, it will need to be reallocated to the performance obligations prior to any revenue recognition.
In our case, the $10,000 discount is reallocated between Annual Services and Professional Services based on their relative SSP ratio as above. The amount in the accounting unit is the amount over which Revenue Recognition would occur per ASC 606.
The above example is based on a relatively simple SaaS contract. Many complexities exist in today’s environment with hybrid SaaS contracts that involve an element of both License and Subscription services and other complex hosting arrangements. Further, usage-based SaaS contracts are becoming increasingly popular, sometimes with an element of both fixed and variable fee structures. Future discounts and other variable considerations can further complicate accounting.
If you’d like to learn more about ASC 606 specifics, you might be interested in reading these related blogs:
- Implementing ASC 606 Controls Under Pandemic Conditions
- Life Post-ASC 606 Implementation
- Post-ASC 606: Using Your CRM to Ensure Timely Billing
- Implementation of ASC 606 Revenue Standard: Financial Consulting Perspectives from the Field
We also offer a whitepaper to help you through the process of revenue software selection, which you can access by clicking the image below:
About the Author
Akash has more than 20 years of diverse finance and accounting experience in mid- to large-sized public and private companies. He is a PwC and E&Y alum and has held leadership roles as a Controller and Finance Director in publicly traded and PE-backed Technology Consolidation and Manufacturing companies such as ESW Capital LLC, Idera Inc., Komatsu Inc. (formerly Joy Global Inc.) and Underwriters Labs Inc. Akash has split his time overseeing and driving a range of M&A, FP&A, Controllership and financial system transformation activities involving due diligence, post-merger integrations, ASC 606 implementations, setting up remote shared services, managing audits and dealing with complex issues such as spinoffs, valuations, consolidations and architecting/integrating best of breed cloud technologies. Akash holds an MBA in Finance from Illinois Institute of Technology and is an active CPA licensed in Minnesota.
Categorized in: Financial Reporting & Accounting